tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4667186581055843327.post4042459942786022697..comments2023-06-01T10:38:03.832+02:00Comments on DVCS Comparison: On rebasingaoeuohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18078968458776470061noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4667186581055843327.post-24512871516510379832010-04-09T13:19:39.364+02:002010-04-09T13:19:39.364+02:00I am a newbie to Git and I don't think that I ...I am a newbie to Git and I don't think that I quite understand something in your post.<br /><br />It seems as though what you may be saying is that instead of using a merge, into the "mainline", you would suggest rebasing your topic branch onto your "mainline" branch. In this way, you retain all of the commits that was on your topic branch....does that sound about accurate?<br /><br />I liek this idea a lot. Where I am getting confused is how would it cause problems in rewriting the history and sharing it. I am familiar with the problems of rewriting the history of a shared branch, but in this case, if you are rebasing your changes from a topic branch onto the master, you really aren't changing the history of the master branch at all (in this scenario the topic branch is local and not shared while the master branch is)...perhaps I am missing something.<br /><br />ThanksCarlus Henryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10118327352251205251noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4667186581055843327.post-79647965108490956932009-12-15T16:02:32.155+01:002009-12-15T16:02:32.155+01:00Great post as for me. It would be great to read a ...Great post as for me. It would be great to read a bit more concerning this theme. Thank you for posting this data.<br />Sexy Lady<br /><a href="http://www.secret-agent.co.uk/" rel="nofollow">English escorts</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com